Foundation has a similar grid system to Bootstrap with 12 columns to choose from. by Jeremy Thomas, creator of Bulma, Oleksii Potiekhin,Mikko Lauhakari, Aslam Shah and David Berning. var totalClasses = 0; var classes = {}; for(i=0; i< document.all.length; i++) { var el = document.all[i]; totalClasses = totalClasses + el.classList.length; el.classList.forEach(function(c) { classes[c] = true; }); }; console.log("Classes", {total: totalClasses, unique: Object.keys(classes).length});, Creating a local development Kubernetes cluster with k3s and Traefik Proxy, JavaScript Console: Take Debugging to Next Level, JavaScript Under The Hood Pt. Bulma has always been a Bootstrap fan, inspired by its goal and purpose.

For each framework, I’m going to create a dummy blog layout with as many major components as possible. That meant I was unable to install the less packages so I had to fall back to the semantic-ui-css package and compiled css packages. Additionally some modules have an explicit dependency on other files contained in utilities and the documentation never mentioned importing base/ to normalize the css.

In this story I will evaluate the following CSS libraries/frameworks. Here is a quick start guide on Bootstrap.

… There is considerable support for the framework to help you if you get stuck in the process. To use Semantic components in your project, you need to complete the following steps: To compare Semantic with Bootstrap vs Foundation and the others, you would notice that in spite of intuitive naming conventions, Semantic falls short in terms of complexity to learn.

It provides a modular sass framework to optimize your bundle to only the necessary classes which we will use as much as possible. The biggest drawback of Bootstrap is the increase in page weight.
In addition to being mobile first, there is some support for touchscreens. As a result, responsive web design is a necessity for every website that is developed today. Overall the site came out looking pretty nice with 0 (zero!) The new page "Alternative to Bootstrap" draws a feature comparison to help undecided users choose the right tool for their web design needs, which can be either Bulma or Bootstrap. Turns out I had forgotten to add to the index.html but surprisingly none of the other CSS frameworks had any issues without HTML5 mode. UIkit is a modern, lightweight framework with a huge emphasis on modularity to create web interfaces. It is the most popular CSS framework on this list, with over 130k stars on GitHub. Pretty similar overall and Bulma uses the is-keyword that is pretty readable. Out of the box elements: 3.5/5 (most are Javascript add-ons which we aren’t using here). Foundation, on the other hand, gives you more control and freedom over your components, without the need to add classes to DOM elements – as properties are associated with components. While a few hundred kilobytes may not be significant in a world where the average page size is around 2MB, it may concern developers who aim for the highest efficiency. "Responsiveness", "UI components" and "Consistent" are the key factors why developers consider Bootstrap; whereas "Easy setup", "Easy-to-customize the sass build" and "Community-created themes" are the primary reasons why Bulma is favored. Semantic is the framework that has a relatively easier learning curve, and supports JavaScript frameworks too. I was unsure of the difference between col-sm and col-6 and why some classes were col-6 and some were a mix of multiple class markups such as “col col-lg-2". It’s not perfect but we can at least evaluate some objective values and looking to minimize file size of libraries is always a good practice. Bootstrap is perfect for those who want to quickly iterate solutions in an agile environment.

Bulma vs Bootstrap Vue: What are the differences? Foundation, first released within a month of Bootstrap in 2011, is a class of front end frameworks for not just websites, but applications and emails too! As Bootstrap is a mature project, it supports many accessibility features. UIkit helps you create responsive designs, with automated continuous deployment on BrowserStack. Bootstrap offers more support from the community, is a bit easier to work with, and gives you a wide range of themes to choose from when getting stared. This meant that I had to write a lot more custom css rules to get our website up and running. I wouldn’t hesitate to reach for it when I want total control. Over the last few years, the browsing habits of end users have evolved to include a variety of devices. Weirdly, I spent some time debugging an issue where the header was 100% of the height. The current stable version is 4.3. Form styling at first was more difficult than expected, there’s an input style available and I spent some time building it myself until later I found forms under collections. Let’s get started: Bootstrap is a responsive, mobile-first CSS framework to develop websites quickly. Moreover, while Bootstrap maintains a list of approved frameworks and kits for you to choose from, third party developers also offer kits and packages for Bootstrap that can be integrated with your projects equally easily.
Overall the site looks very clean and the amount of custom work required was minimal.